All posts by Cheng, Cho, & Yee, Immigration Lawyers

What Chicago Immigrants Should Know About the “Uninsured Ban”

Two feet standing on each side of a yellow line

The U.S. Court of Appeals recently upheld the Trump administration’s “uninsured ban,” which prevents immigrants from entering the country without “approved” health insurance. There are several details that immigrants in Chicago should know about the uninsured ban and how it may affect them.

Two feet standing on each side of a yellow line

What Is the Uninsured Ban?

The uninsured ban is an extension of 8 U.S.C. § 1182(f), which is a provision that enables the president to prevent immigrants from entering the country under the belief that they may compromise the interests of the United States. Specifically, the uninsured ban could prevent immigrants from entering the country if they don’t have an “approved” insurance plan that a government subsidy supports.

An “approved” healthcare plan is one that falls outside of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which the Trump administration has notoriously opposed. While the ACA was intended to provide extensive coverage for people enrolled in the program and promote improved health with reduced long-term costs, the Trump administration implemented cheaper bare-bones plans that reduce costs through minimal coverage. As a result, many “approved” healthcare plans provide coverage only for particularly serious health conditions and not preventive care, such as routine checkups with doctors.

How the Uninsured Ban Makes It Harder to Gain Entry

Because of the definition of an “approved” plan under the uninsured ban, the ban prevents many from entering the U.S. who would otherwise qualify for visas, including sponsored spouses, other family members of U.S. citizens, and lawful permanent residents. The reason for this is many people working at minimum wage jobs don’t receive insurance coverage from employers. Subsequently, it’s extremely difficult for these citizens to sponsor family members unless those relatives can afford an “approved” plan.

Attempts to Reverse the Ban

Although many challengers argued against the uninsured ban because of its restrictive nature, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit still upheld the uninsured ban on December 31. Since more than 180 days have passed since the date the ban became effective on November 3, 2019, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo will be responsible for determining whether the ban is still required.

As of January, a new administration is in place under President Joe Biden, who may be able to reverse the ban in the near future in addition to other Trump-era policies surrounding immigration.

Attention DACA Applicants: There May Be Hope Yet

As of the beginning of 2021, over 170 Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) applicants has been approved by the federal government, giving many other applicants hope. The approved applicants were among those who applied for the Obama-era program before the Trump administration ended it in 2017.

What a New DHS Report Reveals

In early January, a report submitted to Brooklyn federal court by the Department of Homeland Security disclosed the approval of 171 new DACA applications taking place from November 14 to the end of 2020. Meanwhile, the DHS denied another 121 applications and rejected 369. The report also revealed that a total of 2,713 applications were submitted awaiting approval, denial, or rejection.

In June 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court has determined that Trump was in violation of federal law when ending the DACA program in 2017. Regardless, Homeland Security secretary Chad Wolf stated that the Trump administration would both cease accepting new applications and shorten renewals from two years to one.

Later in the year, U.S. District Judge Nicholas Garaufis reasoned that Trump’s cessation of the DACA program was unconstitutional and ordered the federal government to begin accepting DACA applications that entered the system before the program ended.

In addition, Garaufis argued that Wolf took his position through illicit means and ordered the reinstatement of the two-year renewals. Garaufis also ordered DHS to report the number of new applicants who were rejected throughout the year from June to December. The released report revealed that 4,383 applications were rejected during that period.

Approved Renewals Along with New Applications

In light of the DHS report, it was revealed that the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services branch of the department approved 61,844 renewals within the last six weeks of 2020. However, the USCIS also denied 326 applications and rejected another 2,842 in that time.

The Background of the DACA Program

The DACA program began in 2012 when the Obama administration put it in place to protect approximately 800,000 young immigrants who entered the U.S. illegally as children. While the program didn’t grant these children, also known as DREAMers, official legal status or a direct path to U.S. citizenship with their families, it enabled them to make a living in the U.S. Specifically, the program allowed DREAMers to apply for social security numbers, work permits, and driver’s licenses.

Early on, the Trump administration attempted to dismantle the DACA program, ending it in 2017.

Efforts to Reinstate the DACA Program After the Trump Era

With President Joe Biden in office, the new administration has pledged to reinstate the DACA program in January. This is one of many attempts to reverse Trump-era policies that Biden promised to enact. However, with the reinstatement of the DACA program, Congress would still need to approve permanent legal status and a pathway to citizenship for immigrants who wish to become naturalized citizens.

What Is Required to Apply for DACA?

If people were unable to apply for the DACA program during Trump’s presidency, they may be able to apply in the near future with Biden’s reinstatement. If new applicants want to qualify, there are several criteria that they will need to meet. These requirements include:

  • Unlawful entry into the U.S. before the age of 16
  • Aged 30 or younger on June 15, 2012, (i.e. born on June 16, 1981, or later)
  • Did not have any lawful status on June 15, 2012
  • Were physically within the U.S. on June 15, 2012, and when requesting consideration for DACA through USCIS
  • Have lived in the U.S. and no other country since June 15, 2007

Other requirements include completion of high school or a GED program, honorable discharge from the U.S., armed forces, or current enrollment in a U.S. school. Applicants must not have felony convictions or serious misdemeanors, nor can they have three or more other misdemeanors.

When applying for the DACA program, it’s necessary to have all required supporting documents present. Documents include proof of identity in the form of a state-issued ID, passport, military or school ID, or birth certificate. Applicants must also have proof of entry into the U.S. before the age of 16, which may include a stamped passport, INS documents, Form I-94, or any other travel, school, hospital, or medical records. 

Other supporting documents include proof of presence in the U.S. on June 15, 2012, proof of no lawful status on June 15, 2012, documents that prove brief and innocent trips outside of the U.S. since 2007, and proof of current or previous education.

New applicants can visit the USCIS website for additional information about requirements and how to apply if and when the program is reinstated. The DHS report and a new presidential era leave many young immigrants hoping for a brighter future.

Updated Guidance for Immigrants Who Failed to Obtain Lawful Permanent Resident Status

Permanent resident card and social security card

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has updated guidance to clarify when individuals may not be eligible for naturalization if they did not lawfully obtain permanent residency status or abandoned their LPR status during the adjudication of the naturalization application. The purpose of the policy guidance update is to maintain consistency throughout the decision-making process during naturalization.

Permanent resident card and social security card

When Immigrants Obtain LPR Status Through Fraud

While undergoing the naturalization process, immigrants need to meet certain requirements when applying. One of these requirements is the need to establish that the immigrant was lawfully admitted into the U.S. for permanent residence in line with the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).

Applicants may be found ineligible for naturalization if they obtained LPR status through fraud, in error, or if they otherwise were not in compliance with the law. This includes instances where USCIS previously granted adjustment of status or admitted the applicant because the agency was not aware of material facts that should have disqualified the individual.

When Applicants Previously Abandonded Their Status

Some applicants may also be ineligible if they abandoned their LPR status.

What’s Included in the Policy Updates

There are changes included in the new guidance in the USCIS policy manual.

The policy affirms that applicants who failed to obtain LPR status lawfully are ineligible for naturalization. This includes cases in which the government was unaware of material facts that disqualified applicants resulting in a granted adjustment to LPR status or admittance of LPR applicants.

The policy provides additional guidance on specific circumstances that can lead to the agency finding someone ineligible for naturalization due to failure to gain lawful admission for permanent residence. It also details that USCIS reviews whether applicants have abandoned their LPR status throughout the adjudication of the naturalization application.

Further, the policy details that USCIS denies naturalization applications that were filed on or following November 18, 2020, if applicants are in the process of removal. This is because USCIS doesn’t have the authority to review the merits of naturalization applications if applicants have a pending removal proceeding that started because of a warrant for the applicant’s arrest.

If applicants for naturalization have failed to obtain LPR status for any reason, following the USCIS guidance in the policy manual can help applicants determine which steps to take. While failure to obtain LPR status can hinder a person’s ability to become a U.S. citizen, it’s still possible for immigrants and their families to gain citizenship.

The Future of the EB-5 Program

Going into 2021, there are changes to anticipate regarding the EB-5 program. The COVID-19 pandemic led to the slowdown of many processes, but aspects of the EB-5 regional center program are progressing.

Some of the changes that people can expect to see include the reauthorization of the EB-5 regional center program, new processing fees, and increased collecting of biometrics.

What Is the EB-5 Program?

The EB-5 visa is a U.S. visa that enables eligible immigrant investors to establish lawful permanent residency in the U.S. by investing at least $900,000 in an American business that employs at least 10 workers. A majority of immigrant investors in the EB-5 program tend to invest in targeted employment areas (TEAs), which are areas with high unemployment rates or rural areas. The EB-5 visa was created in 1990 as a result of the introduction of the Immigration Act of 1990.

Investors in the EB-5 program can choose to invest via regional centers in large investor pools, or invest individually. Regional centers are typically for-profit private enterprises that the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has approved. 

New Processing Fees for EB-5 Visa Petitions

One of the biggest changes to the EB-5 program is the increased or decreased fees for all EB-5-related petitions. The following fees went into effect as of October 2, 2020:

  • I-485 fees decreased to $1,130 from $1,140
  • I-526 fees increased to $4,010 from $3,675
  • I-829 fees increased to $3,900 from $3,750
  • I-924 fees remained steady at $17,795
  • I-924A fees increased to $4,465 from $3,035

The most notable of the fee changes is the 47% increase seen with the I-924A petition.

The Reauthorization of the EB-5 Regional Center Program

The EB-5 industry is anticipating another short-term reauthorization of the EB-5 regional center program, as the federal government has yet to provide a long-term reauthorization for longer than several months. The reauthorization is expected to offer several months’ worth of funds for the federal government while extending federal programs that are nearing expiration.

In an effort to ensure that a long-term reauthorization takes place at some point, CMB Regional Centers is cooperating with Invest in the USA (IIUSA) along with other EB-5 trade organizations. In the process, CMB and these organizations are working with members of Congress to reach a long-term reauthorization in the near future.

Changes to Biometrics

As of September 11, 2020, USCIS officially published a new proposed rule in the federal register that would permit an increase in biometric data collection from individuals in the EB-5 visa program. Specifically, the rule aims to increase the type of data collected along with the instances in which this data may be necessary to include.

How COVID-19 Impacted the EB-5 Program

Everyone in the U.S. has been impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic over the course of 2020, as the number of infections continues to increase and millions remain unemployed. With the suffering economy, the EB-5 program has the ability to help during these unprecedented times, particularly as it incentivizes investment in areas with high unemployment rates. Unfortunately, the existing TEA system setup doesn’t permit the EB-5 program to address the economic downturn that came with the pandemic.

The determined TEAs depend on unemployment averages from the previous year, which means that 2021 I-526 petitions will use figures from 2020. Subsequently, the unemployment figures in 2020 will factor into TEA designation in 2021, along with the duration of the pandemic, the number of permanently closed businesses, and the length of time it takes for the economy to recover.

The issue of relative employment may further impede the EB-5 program’s capacity for helping build the economy back up. In other words, if unemployment rates continue to increase in the U.S., the TEA program won’t incentivize many areas’ investments, regardless of their economic situation. The only areas to benefit from EB-5 TEA designation in 2021 will be those that were negatively affected the most.

As a result, only certain areas may benefit from the EB-5 program, but a majority of the country won’t see the benefits. However, the upside is that the previously mentioned changes to the EB-5 program could help better position the program to boost the American economy and secure a better future for the country coming out of the pandemic.

What all of this means is that if immigrant investors are considering filing EB-5 petitions, they’re better off filing now than waiting until a later date. The sooner individuals file for business immigrant visas, the more money they will save. While the new processing fees and other changes have been implemented, 2021 could bring about new changes that make the program even more expensive and difficult to navigate.

Immigrants: Critical Contributors to Illinois [infographic]

Immigrants in Illinois contribute a lot to local communities as citizens across the state. The following data shows how immigrants comprise the residents, workers, and students that support Illinois as of 2020.

Infographic describing the critical contributions of immigrants to Illinois.

(Article continues below infographic)

Immigrants in Illinois contribute a lot to local communities as citizens across the state. The following data shows how immigrants comprise the residents, workers, and students that support Illinois as of 2020.

(Article continues below infographic)

Immigrants Critical Contributors to Illinois Infographic

Immigrants Account for One in Every Seven Residents in Illinois

In Illinois, according to the American Immigration Council, one out of seven residents is an immigrant. Native-born U.S. citizens who have at least one immigrant parent account for another one in seven residents.

In 2018, there were around 1.8 million immigrants in Illinois. The majority of those immigrants came from Mexico (36%), followed by India, Poland, the Philippines, and China. Of those immigrants, 844,506 were men, 866,951 were women, and there were 79,856 immigrant children.

Illinois Contains Many DACA Recipients

As of March 2020, there were around 33,940 recipients of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). In 2019, around 51% of individuals who were eligible to receive DACA applied for the program. 

One in Every Six Workers Is an Immigrant in Illinois

When it comes to the workforce in Illinois, immigrants account for a huge portion. In total, as of 2018, Illinois contained 1.2 million immigrant workers. These workers had occupations primarily in the manufacturing, health care, hospitality, food service, retail, and construction industries.

Regarding specific occupations, most immigrant workers had jobs in production, transportation and material moving, office and administrative support, sales, and management.

A Majority of Illinois Immigrants Are Naturalized

In Illinois, 52% of immigrants were naturalized as of 2018, with over 77% found to speak English either “well” or “very well.”

Immigrants Contribute Billions to the State Economy as Consumers

In addition to being contributory workers in many industries, immigrant residents in Illinois are also huge spenders as consumers. As of 2018, residents in immigrant-led households in Illinois had a spending power of $47.8 billion after taxes.

Immigrants Paid Tens of Billions Toward Taxes

In 2018, Illinois households made up of immigrants and immigrant families contributed $7.7 billion in state and local taxes, along with $12.7 billion in federal taxes.

Undocumented immigrants also contributed over a billion dollars, paying $708.9 million in state and local taxes and $945.5 million in federal taxes.

Immigrants enrolled or eligible for the DACA program accounted for another $120.5 million in state and local taxes.

These are just some of the ways immigrants continue to contribute to local communities.

Immigrants Account for One in Every Seven Residents in Illinois

In Illinois, according to the American Immigration Council, one out of seven residents is an immigrant. Native-born U.S. citizens who have at least one immigrant parent account for another one in seven residents.

In 2018, there were around 1.8 million immigrants in Illinois. The majority of those immigrants came from Mexico (36%), followed by India, Poland, the Philippines, and China. Of those immigrants, 844,506 were men, 866,951 were women, and there were 79,856 immigrant children.

Illinois Contains Many DACA Recipients

As of March 2020, there were around 33,940 recipients of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). In 2019, around 51% of individuals who were eligible to receive DACA applied for the program. 

One in Every Six Workers Is an Immigrant in Illinois

When it comes to the workforce in Illinois, immigrants account for a huge portion. In total, as of 2018, Illinois contained 1.2 million immigrant workers. These workers had occupations primarily in the manufacturing, health care, hospitality, food service, retail, and construction industries.

Regarding specific occupations, most immigrant workers had jobs in production, transportation and material moving, office and administrative support, sales, and management.

A Majority of Illinois Immigrants Are Naturalized

In Illinois, 52% of immigrants were naturalized as of 2018, with over 77% found to speak English either “well” or “very well.”

Immigrants Contribute Billions to the State Economy as Consumers

In addition to being contributory workers in many industries, immigrant residents in Illinois are also huge spenders as consumers. As of 2018, residents in immigrant-led households in Illinois had a spending power of $47.8 billion after taxes.

Immigrants Paid Tens of Billions Toward Taxes

In 2018, Illinois households made up of immigrants and immigrant families contributed $7.7 billion in state and local taxes, along with $12.7 billion in federal taxes.

Undocumented immigrants also contributed over a billion dollars, paying $708.9 million in state and local taxes and $945.5 million in federal taxes.

Immigrants enrolled or eligible for the DACA program accounted for another $120.5 million in state and local taxes.

These are just some of the ways immigrants continue to contribute to local communities.